Видео

@scintkapolska5598 this is the dumbest response I have seen. Asian countries unlike here in the U.S. are not influenced by western constructs for ethnic groups. China, Japan, South Korea, Singapore do not see color as an Ethnic marker! This lame. Let me remind you I'm pro wrestler and I have a lot of Asian friends and none of them see me as Black. They see me as Dominican. Next. ✌️

We could be Samoha, fidji, Hawaii, Polynesians

@@user-ch4kp9qc3b Fiji might be 100% possible! ☺

I don't hate dominican btw, i don't have the enèji. but this is just what I have noticed from them.

Terms negro/negrito/Moreno/rubia etc are endearment terms. Being Dominican is an idiosyncratic identity. Dominicans do not identify by color. Dominicans do not like ethno centrics for reason of telling us how we should identify. Beef between Dominicans and the Haitian ethnic group is rooted in social and economic implications. Evidence of this is in two of our historical manifestos. The people of Haiti are an afro Franco ethnic group who were imported by the French during the 18th century. The people of Haiti maternally L haplogroup and paternally E1B1 are African people with minimal European admixture. Dominican people do not need outsiders to tell them how to identify.

@AntilleanFederation where does the phrase "mejorar la raza" come from and why do dominikèn say it. Explain bro, because in creole have no equivalent for this.

​@@mixtapemania6769Haitian people are the Original Indigenous people just like most Black Americans. The only difference is the culture and forced European language.

@@c4tmh133 Stop it, we Haitian don't subscribe to this American idea of being indigenous people. We claim African descent and nothing else, maybe a little white. But we have very little indigenous blood, the Spanish wipe them out.

Then what is everyone? Society classifies everyone thru the lens of Black and White unfortunely, so if that is true what you said then no one is actually White either in the sense that they refer to themselves. People see each other FIRST by the color of the skin, then they try to match up the skin to the ethnicity then the culture. So your statement is wrong. There are so called Black people and White people and so on down the chain.

@parisparchment-we7pq ethnic classification by skin color has been since 20th century an North American phenomenon. This ties in to the one drop rule which is outdated and racist to the latter. Color and ethnicity has been tied closely to the history of the United States, especially with people of African American descent. Outside of the United States and the Western world groups outside do not equate identity and nationality on the basis of the color of someone's skin. People of Hispanic descent identify with where they reside in place of skin color. For Dominicans these examples would be Dominicano/na, Quisqueyano, cibaeño/ña, etc. These are ethnic classifications for the Dominican people. Ethnic classifications for Dominicans on the basis of color came by way of Americans during the early 20th century. By this time Dominicans already had their ethnic classifications well established. As ours reflects 500 plus year evolution on the island as a young ethnic group.

@Baman21 their comparison is very ethno centric in nature. It's not that complicated. Being Dominican is an idiosyncratic idenity. Color as a ethnic marker does not apply to Dominicans.

@@AntilleanFederation There is no Dominican box on the census in America....they check something. What do they check?

@Baman21 why are you so obsessed with Dominicans?🤔 We have a idiosyncratic idenity with a Hispanic culture that evolved on the island. Period. What's so difficult to comprehend?

​@@AntilleanFederationwhy make a video and a statement if you don't want anyone talking about it. I never denied that Dominicans have a specific ethnicity or identity. I don't know why your silly video was on my feed....lol say less

@Baman21 the problem is with ethno centrics as yourself. Who refuse to respect the Dominican people and their identity. And comparing us to your identity and culture. Knowing very well we are not the same. As you see. Your response shows me that you are reactionary and low in consciousness. The presentation is pretty clear. You just refuse to get the picture. Such an irrational response. I expected better.

Seremein niduhei. Wani arufudahati garinagu liri Milton Guity. Agambatina musun garifuna.

@Jerry-er6gn can you elaborate a little further?🤔 Your response in regards makes no sense at all.

​@AntilleanFederation bra u a typical NYC Dominican or Puerto Rican bc most of yall out their racist I already know lol. But my cousins in cali Puerto Rican some of mixed but nigga we know our roots better than u. Self hatred is deep and my brotha u hate ur self I'm sorry if a dark skinned robbed u or beat u up it's OK bro it's time to forgive 💯

@skssuccess75 no. It does not apply. Black Americans in the U.S. have experiences that set them apart from Caribbean Hispanics. Watch Tomas Sowell. Dominicans are a Hispanic ethnic group in the Spanish speaking Caribbean with an idiosyncratic identity and Hispanic culture that evolved on the island.

@@AntilleanFederation Could you explain further? How is having different experiences relevant to your social classification? Would you called Haitians non-Black since they're part of the Latino community and speak a latin base language? Is being latino vs. hispanic totally different?

@skssuccess75 Haitian people are not an Hispanic diaspora. They are an afro-franco ethnic group. They speak French and Haitian Creole. They were imported into the island of Hispaniola by the French during the 18th century for their plantation economy. Latino and Hispanic are interchangeable for someone who is from any of the Latin American countries. Speaking for Spanish speaking Caribbean Dominicans are a Latin/Hispanic American ethnic group with a Hispanic culture that evolved on the island (via post contact). Would modern Egyptians and Moroccans identify as being black? The answer is no. They have their own culture and ethnic identity for which they identify with. Outside of the U.S. various ethnic groups do not identify with black (black being synonymous with the color of your skin). As that is a North American cultural identification mainly with Black Americans.

@@AntilleanFederation Ok... I don't know where you're located, but I'm in California and a classification in regard to racial/ethnic group was added between 10 to 15 years ago. There's Black (American decent) then there is another category called Black of Latin/Hispanic decent. This social class was based off of American policies in regard to the Census. I know of Africans who would be considered Black here in the U.S. who didn't regard themselves as Black in the own countries. They went by their nationalities as well as their ethnic groups (Fulani, Ibo, Hausa, etc. ) Also in recorded history there were Spanish Conquistadors like Juan Garrido, Pedro Alonzo Nino, Estevanico who went by their nationalities but in today's U.S.A. would be considered Black. I don't fully be in the African Transatlantic slave trade as it was taught to us. I believe there were already so-called "Black" people here in the "New World" and the so-called "Black" Europeans who were considered Moors back then were being kicked out of Spain and other places in European during the Spanish Inquisition came here. What would be considered so-called "White" Europeans didn't start coming in droves until the mid 1850's and started mixing with the different local populations.

@skssuccess75 ethic idenity based on the color of your skin is a North American phenomenon (Mainly in the United States). As I already explained outside of the United States no one uses this identification unless they are of afrocentric perspective. The video you are commenting is in regards to the ethnic identity of the Dominican people who do not use color as an ethnic marker nor as an identification. Our history is different from Black Americans. We did not have Jim Crow, Black Codes, etc. Spanish stop importing enslaved African people by the end of the 16th century. Spain also abandoned the Spanish colony for three centuries. People of African descent also did not arrive to the Americas until post 1492. That is the 1500s and up. There is no evidence whatsoever of people of African descent in the Americas before Columbus. That has been debunked. Watch Cheif X on RUclips.

It's more realistic to respect other people's ethic idenity and culture. With an understanding that each ethnic group in the global community has a unique demographic history that reflects their history as a people. I do not believe in victimization. Stay grounded in science and anthropology.

Here we cover about Arawaks/Tainos. The indigenous inhabitants of the Caribbean did not have beards or body hair. Arawaks are not Israelites. We know more today because of advancement in science, DNA and also the archeological record. Please take your pseudo science elsewhere.

Would have to add deportation of all illegals to the conversion. Respectfully. It's not a simple fix. As that would cause an outrage from the international community.

What diplomatic relations? Haiti doesn’t even have a government. Borders are not that simple to close, and you can’t completely seal them from everyone. And first you would have to convince the big construction companies that they shouldn’t hire illegal immigrants, and at the same time avoiding a sudden inflation of housing costs.

Just seeing this comment will respond. all the best.

@ParteraQuisqueyana sorry for the late response. I don't always see the notifications on RUclips. And I like to take time to respond to my followers. As I stated in my PowerPoint the migrant problem began in the early 20th century by way North Americans who took advantage of instabilities of time. And creating the bilateral contracts, paving the way for the current situation. Second. Through science and evolution Haiti chaos is a reflection lack of time to develop. Many cultures that flourish had time to develop and grow. Between 1791 and 1804 that was not enough time for the people of Haiti to develop a collective ethnic consciousness. This why through its short recorded history, Haiti has a history of instabilities. An example of this is the development of their anti French sentiment in the 19th century. It reflects the anger of the people of Haiti due to the brutality of the French plantation model. During the 18th century enslaved African people in Saint Domingue had a high mortality rate. This another indicator of lack of ethnic consciousness. They are a young ethnic group emerging through violence in the former French colony. Modern politics will miss this important observation.

Your response is as silly as day and night. In this area of RUclips space is about science and logic. No obsession here. Haitians are included in the discussion because there is a lot they also get wrong. And there are Haitian people that do try and claim Taino ancestry. It's called being science illiterate.

@@AntilleanFederation My comment seem to have triggered you. Haitians don't get anything wrong regarding their country. It's a black country and all Haitians are declared black according to Haiti's constitution. As for the few Haitians who claim Arawak (the word Taíno is not used in Haiti) blood, they are obviously uneducated Haitians who think it is a positive thing to have blood from a people that were so backward that they were so easily decimated. And yes, there are a few that are unfortunate enough to have inherited a little drop of the Arawak's genes. The whole world knows Haitians and Dominicans are different people of different races, different culture, different religion, different world views, so I don't know why the obsession. Your admiration for race mixing is not shared by Europeans, Asians, or proud blacks. Most races reject it.

Black American here and no thank you darling. I'm enjoying the research and got no BEEF with anyone. Toodles ~

Wrong. Dominicans inherit 70% European and North African lineages. Comparing the maternal and paternal lineages (2017, 2020) show's that Dominicans are neither black nor white. Dominicans are an admixed ethnic group. Dominicans are descendants of first contact interactions. Would be more accurate.

​@@AntilleanFederation Compai usted es puro Moreno. Aceptalo , no tiene que ser negativo, have you done your DNA ancestry? Historically puerto ricans are 20 percent taino. Dominicans are only about 10. Me myself I was about 7 percent taino and 39 percent african with a 48 percent spain/Portuguese. With small percentages in other nations. Casi todo los dominicanos son negros pero tienen los cojones de decir "I'm not black" eso da Pena no niegen su decendencia.

Hi Jorge hope all is well with you first of all. I will keep this very simple. Hiwatahia is a made up language you created. Say what you want about garifuna but in reality it's closest to speaking island Arawak. Regardless of post contact influence. And it's the only living island Arawak language alive today from Taino and Kalinago. The garifuna people should get a lot more credit. Why go with a mix of mainland Arawak? Knowing Taino has about 2,000 years of separation from mainland Arawak. The closest would be Kalinago, followed by Garifuna. Wow Jorge. VSO is non Arawak? You must be bugging right? Did you bother to learn speak Garifuna or lokojañ for the latter before creating your language? Which sounds North American in my opinion. The point is why make up a language? Instead learn speak Arawak languages that are endemic like garifuna and lokojañ. Real sad Jorge. Number one you are always emotional when responding which makes you subjective instead being objective in reasoning. Real cult vibes from your response. You said it yourself in one context, you said what matters is the truth. Point is if I had your influence and pull I would strongly encourage people to learn the garifuna language. Which is the only island Arawak I repeat still spoken today. Or learn how to speak lokojañ. My two cents.

👇 Word order of overt arguments is generally irrelevant within the alignment systems of the Arawak languages, where arguments are most commonly encoded via verbal person marking, and free nominal or pronominal arguments often have marked discourse status, resulting in a variety of acceptable word orders for free arguments. Additionally, basic word order differs across the CNA languages: basic word order in Lokono is SVO, but VSO in the other three languages. For Garifuna, Way´uu, and A˜nun, an overt syntactic subject always follows the predicate, irrespective of predicate type.

👇 The reconstruction of word order for language families is somewhat controversial (Lightfoot, 1979; Harris, 2008; Campbell and Harris, 2002; BarDdal, 2013), but the time depth at which the CNA languages are related is relatively shallow (roughly 1200 years for proto-CNA, 1000 years for TA-Arawak, and 500 years for proto-A˜nun-Way´uu (Stark, 2017), and the branching structure of the clade is such that VSO word order (predicate initiality) is very likely a retention in Garifuna, A˜nun, and Way´uu, and deviations from that word order in Lokono are likely innovative. Since Lokono, A˜nun, and Way´uu form a subgroup to the exclusion of Garifuna, the likelihood that a deviation in word order happened in Lokono, only, is a more parsimonious scenario in a simple majority-rules-style analysis.

👇 Following Hawkins (1994, pp. 95-106), I assume that a change which separates verbal arguments from the verb itself increases processing load, and is therefore less likely than the reverse change - because VSO word order separates the verb from its object, the claim is that a change in word order with this output (e.g., SVO → VSO) is unlikely because it puts a higher processing load on a language user. Under this view, the most parsimonious word order reconstruction for proto-CNA is VSO, where Lokono underwent a word order change VSO → SVO that allowed for adjacency between a predicate and its arguments, decreasing processing load for that construction.

👇 The word order in Arawakan languages is very varied. For 30 languages30 , there are seven possibilities, the number of languages are given in brackets: SVO (12), SOV (5), active (5), VSO (5), VOS (1), OSV (1) and free (1). More than one third of the languages use SVO, while 15% use SOV, 15 % active and 15 % VSO. Only one language each uses VOS, OSV and free word order. As SVO and SOV are the most frequent word orders of the worlds' languages (wals.info/feature/81A), it is not surprising that SVO and SOV are the most common word orders in Arawakan languages as well. One explanation for the especially high occurrence of SVO could be the parallel structure to the predicate which is the core of the Arawakan sentence - A is prefixed while O is suffixed. Not at all common in general is the active word order. Active word order means that the word order corresponds to the active-stative alignment system - S is treated different depending on the semantics of the verb. In an intransitive clause, the word order would be SaV or VSo, respectively. As the original affix-pattern was activestative - and still is in the majority of the languages - the relatively high percentage of 15 % for active word order is not very remarkable either. VSO and free word order are neither very common nor very unusual over the world.